[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bpfk] Re: BPFK Pages: DAhO



i le te cuxna cu se cmima ro le jivna e pa xanri jivna no'u la nonjinga zi'e poi sinxa lesi'o cuxna node i da'o 
How can this example make sense? What does {da'o} cancel? A hidden {da} in {pa xanri}? Why should it be {da}, not {daxipanononono}? Even if it cancels all assignments how this example would be different without {da}?





2014-12-02 13:26 GMT+03:00 Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>:
http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Reference+Regulators
1) da'o is moved to selma'o UI. DAhO is almost UI anyway. 


3) da'inai means this: the variable da'onai is attached to retains its assignment and all other variables are cleared. 
This is a mistype. It should be {da'onai}


4) da'oda'o means that all variables have their assignments cleared.
This contradicts with how UI work. This can no longer be UI or UI becomes impractical from the viewpoint of parsers.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.