Note: everything you pasted is from the "proposal to change {da'o}" section, not its main definition. It's not clear to me how close the proposal is to being implemented.On Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote:
1) da'o is moved to selma'o UI. DAhO is almost UI anyway.3) da'inai means this: the variable da'onai is attached to retains its assignment and all other variables are cleared.This is a mistype. It should be {da'onai}Yep.This contradicts with how UI work. This can no longer be UI or UI becomes impractical from the viewpoint of parsers.4) da'oda'o means that all variables have their assignments cleared.It's a semantics issue, not a parser issue. Seems fine to me.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.