[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] official cmavo form




On 14 Dec 2014 19:03, "John Cowan" <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
>
> And Rosta scripsit:
> > Otherwise, the failure of [tuitsku] to realize any word constitutes an
> > arbitrary prohibition, and it is in the nature of arbitrary prohibitions
> > that there is a need to liberalize them.
>
> As arbitrary prohibitions go, this is nothing compared to the limitations
> on initial CCs.

If I were actually casting my vote, instead of proxying it to xorxes on the grounds of his sounder judgement, I'd vote to liberalize those initial clusters too. (And it would even not invalidate any prior usage.)

--And.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.