Re: [bpfk] {cifnu}. Clarifying the semantics of the gismu

Subject: Re: [bpfk] {cifnu}. Clarifying the semantics of the gismu

From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 16:10:18 +0300

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=o4XiGZRlX6noCiku4zcfHqp6hdH3rsLwGrj/swIZnKQ=; b=LuNxLqA0Ggx3AwU/MWxQl/SvNOYAyulXEz9FCweqFUu6LWpTarSS4H3WLesdEEjHiR M6ed0IFl5lfNpG8yyIqLgSvmIU+6GjgBG4E31zdZSRNjhtH8mOGLTnFL+iNW4JByT946 gPmJ5xnxUl0zT4j5gwIIdzM6lwE5u7j+RuMDytFOlDaKDPnb2GH2x0Ve+pR08+Rp0zQ7 cUsjI9YKH2FG0rm8vZmrNlFmxzLzMPs+s/1D+hI327ckm9fFcGZxiXirJ9ruuTsx6n34 r5hWggQpXAJni1ekOM+vNkkxnQac9YFeE89TcyS/TYRo8ipk4PpbHo6VZ/HaWtWnIF+s W8xw==

In-reply-to: <CAO7tK2fd0-T_L9PCvEsM-sC7pZKyC579-PqfMLuiZXkRVB5MKw@mail.gmail.com>

List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-lis>

List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>

List-id: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>

List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>

List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>

List-unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>, <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>

Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com

References: <e0fa832e-a0b6-459f-a27d-8c03d032f7f4@googlegroups.com> <CAO7tK2fd0-T_L9PCvEsM-sC7pZKyC579-PqfMLuiZXkRVB5MKw@mail.gmail.com>

Reply-to: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com

Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com

2015-05-31 15:29 GMT+03:00 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:

On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 9:09 AM, la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
Now: {cifnu} = x1 is an infant/baby [helpless through youth/incomplete development] of species x2. |>>> Also infantile. See also makcu, verba.

Proposed: {cifnu} = x1 is an infant, baby, young offspring of species x2. |>>> Not necessarily helpless. See also makcu, verba, panzi.

Reason: a discussion shows that one shouldn't paid attention to "infant", "helpless" and "infantile" words. Separate words for "altricial/precocial", stages of development like larvae, imago etc. and for immature/mature are to be invented instead.

Sounds reasonable. Is there a way to implement this while keeping the original wording available for reference? Many gismu definitions need improvement, but we probably want to keep the original wording safe somewhere as a historical record.

Technically issue 131 says that no definition can be edited since otherwise the concept of voting becomes useless.

This means that definitions entered by "officialdata" can't be changed since this user is not a human. In case some definitions are already edited we will be able to reupload them. The issue also states that one must be able to export all definition from a given user, "officialdata" in this case.

When JVS API is available we will be able to create apps that are able to interact with it thus implementing JVS 2.0 as we want it.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

bpfk-list@googlegroups.com

http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list

https://groups.google.com/d/optout