Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 23:44:05 -0000 From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk> Subject: RE: Re: lo'edu'u
xod:It seems that if one squints at Americans and only sees one girl, that's
e-gadri and not o-gadri. We're avoiding some bloody arguments about the
requirements of objectivity; it's been amusing to watch people dance
around the minefield with words like "veridical", and others get it flat
out wrong by applying strict standards for e-gadri
I will really understand what Nick means about lo'e as soon he relates it
to jboske post 511
for people's convenience, here is msg 511 (sent by xod):
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, John Cowan wrote:
Jorge Llambias scripsit:
Suppose you tell me "I need a box to put these books in. Please get me one."
mi nitcu pa le tanxe selcmi poi seltisna lei cukta
I would say: {mi nitcu lo'e tanxe lo nu setca lei vi cukta ty i e'o ko cpagau mi ty}.
I don't know how to supply you with the typical box, any more than I can capture the typical lion. That is, mi kavbu lo'e cinfo is false, and by the same token mi cpacu lo'e tanxe is false too.
So: .i xu su'o da zo'u da skari su'o tanxe .i go'i .i xu su'o da zo'u da skari so'a tanxe .i na go'i .i xu su'o da zo'u da skari lo'e tanxe .i na'i go'i
.i mi nitcu lo'ei tanxe .i xu su'o da zo'u da skari ri .i go'i fa da kaunai
It occurs to me that some confusion may be caused by taking "lo'e cinfo"Jorge is referring to the statistical mode (sort of like a lion of the
to mean not "the typical lion" but "a typical lion", that is an actual
lion which closely resembles in relevant ways the abstract typical lion.
type that is a numerical plurality), and John is referring something more
like the statistical average (an abstract entity, like a set). I think the
CLL defines lo'e as the latter; the former could be le fadni cinfo.