[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject:? Re: [jboske] killing kau



la nitcion cusku di'e

>OK, tell me where the following fails:
>
>mi djuno ro lo du'u makau catra la lauras.
>
>= ro da
> ro de poi de du'u da catra la lauras.
> zi'epoi de jetnu
> zo'u:
> mi djuno de

These expansions usually fail with negative answers. If we
accept that "I know who killed Laura" must include the case
that when noone killed Laura, I know that noone killed Laura,
then the expansion fails. There is no true {de} such that
{de du'u da catra la lauras}, therefore your expansion
is vacuously true but makes no claim of knowledge. It would
be true even if I don't know that nobody killed Laura.

Jorge, I hate you with the passion of a million red hot suns.


ro da
ro de poi klesi lu'i ro da
ro di poi di du'u lu'o de catra la lauras.
zi'epoi di jetnu
zo'u:
mi djuno de

Where I understand klesi to mean subset, and de to include the empty set.

And yes, I got the quantifiers wrong. What I want to know is, is this the kind of thing the answer is.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++
Nick Nicholas. The Nonce and Future Henry Squirrel was thirsty. He
Linguist. University of Melbourne. walked over to the river bank
nickn@unimelb.edu.au where his good friend Bill Bird
http://www.lexicon.net.au/~opoudjis was sitting. Henry slipped and
fell in the river. Gravity drowned.
--- TALE-SPIN Story Generator, James Meehan, Yale AI Lab, 1975.