On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:36:05AM +1100, Nick Nicholas wrote: > On Wednesday, Dec 18, 2002, at 00:22 Australia/Melbourne, Nick Nicholas > wrote: [...] > > Where I understand klesi to mean subset, and de to include the empty > > set. > > And whatever that fallacy is where the set of all things includes the > set of all things or whatever --- assume I know enough to sidestep it... According to Quine this isn't a problem. His class of all elements is an element. (Of course, not being considered a problem in 1940 doesn't mean it isn't now...). -- Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku
Attachment:
pgp00051.pgp
Description: PGP signature