[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jboske] so, singulatives..

To: jboske@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [jboske] so, singulatives..
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:43:08 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <F107U4RlDUh84ZfeKWE00011d31@hotmail.com> from "Jorge Llambias" at Dec 17, 2002 03:02:42 AM

Jorge Llambias scripsit:

> I have TL 96/1, 97/1, 97/2 and 99/1. I certainly wouldn't mind
> receiving others.

Those are LogNet numbers (LogNet is the analogue of le lojbo karni), not
TL (The Loglanist) numbers. They take the form [1-7]/[1-6].

-- 
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan
"The exception proves the rule." Dimbulbs think: "Your counterexample proves
my theory." Latin students think "'Probat' means 'tests': the exception puts
the rule to the proof." But legal historians know it means "Evidence for an
exception is evidence of the existence of a rule in cases not excepted from."

References:
- RE: [jboske] so, singulatives..
  - From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [jboske] mass, group, Mr Thing (was: RE: loi'e = loi ?
Next by Date: RE: [jboske] makau, dakau
Previous by thread: RE: [jboske] so, singulatives..
Next by thread: RE: [jboske] so, singulatives..
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread