On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 01:26:19PM +1100, Nick Nicholas wrote: > cu'u la xorxes. > >>I would like to make two further proposals (I want them to be > >>taken jointly, not separately): > >> > >>* cmavo for Average are lo'e & le'e > >>* cmavo for Unique are loi'e & lei'e and are made official. > > >I would prefer the reverse assignment, so that usage is not > >invalidated. > > At which point I say ex cathedra that if usage turns out to be only > your usage, it is not a sufficient argument. It has to be a plurality > of Lojbanists' usage. If you are the only one to have used lo'e > extensively, that still cannot count. > > Yes, this is adversarial, and I may well be wrong about you being the > only user. But those are the ground rules for the BPFK. I've been using "lo'e" and "le'e" in the statistical form (which I think is consistent with the book, which is more important not to invalidate than the (sometime addmittedly) experimental usage of some people). -- Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku
Attachment:
pgp00057.pgp
Description: PGP signature