| In a message dated 10/4/2002 2:06:14 PM Central Daylight Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes: << We could distinguish {ja'axipi...} for comments and {ja'exipi...} >> As I said, I would rather that functions be predicates, as irt makes for less confusion and shows the role better: evaluating a new, but related, predicate rather than a comment on how the old predicate is evaluated. {na} is a connective, so none of the categories outlined. It has fixed rules within any evaluation system (and those rules have to fall within a fairly limited range: inversion, True-n, rotation left or right. I can't think of any other plausible {na} at the moment.) |