[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps

To: jboske@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:03:31 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <20021218124045.R55967-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> from "Invent Yourself" at Dec 18, 2002 12:42:42 PM

Invent Yourself scripsit:

> This means that djuno contains two claims: by. jinvi cy., and mi jinvi cy.
> Just like in English. Blech. And then djuno4 is useless: it's always tu'a
> mi

Well, in one sense, but I conceive the point of d4 to be to distinguish
which of multiple possible epistemologies I am entertaining. Perhaps I
distinguish physical and theological truth, e.g. (NOMA).

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> 
http://www.reutershealth.com http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Yakka foob mog. Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork. Chumble spuzz.
-- Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words"

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>

References:
- Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [jboske] The Masses are Asses (was: gadri schon wieder mal)
Next by Date: Re: [jboske] The Masses are Asses (was: gadri schon wieder mal)
Previous by thread: Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
Next by thread: Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread