RE: [jboske] PLEASE READ: proposed voluntary code of conduct for jboske participants

[Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>]

At 08:28 PM 12/18/02 +0000, And Rosta wrote:
> Lojbab:
> > At 04:48 PM 12/18/02 +0000, And Rosta wrote:
> > >If you support or oppose the suggestion, please speak up
> >
> > Oppose
> >
> > 1. I want a 2 letter cmavo to abbreviate %^)
> >
> > 2. The real problems are a) too many topics at once and b) too much
> > unfocused discussion on each topic and c) none of us are that sure how the
> > current discussions relate to the actual work of the byfy (as evidenced by
> > some people talking about deferring some things until the byfy 
> considers them)
> >
> > 3. The Board meeting is back in session again on its own list, and several
> > of your interlocutors have yet another thread to pay attention to besides
> > what appears on jboske and lojban list; I can rely on parliamentary
> > procedure to keep the Board meeting do a single thread at one time, but we
> > have no such discipline here
> >
> > I think that when the byfy list is set up, it needs to be single threaded
> > insofar as is possible, and let the multi-threading remain here on jboske
>
> I note that you oppose it, but I'm not sure why. Do you prefer Jboske
> discussion to continue in its present form?

Once the byfy operation is setup, then jboske has no reason to be 
other-than a free list, but if people want structure such as you describe, 
that is up to them (but I still suggest shorter codes). I myself will 
likely become silent again on jboske, since doing whatever Nick expects of 
byfy members will likely be more than I have time for.

lojbab

--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org