RE: [jboske] multiple membership of terminator selmaho (was: RE: "goi'a"

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

John:
> And Rosta scripsit:
> 
> > Fair enough. But all the parser needs to know is the selmaho, no?
> 
> Well, in one sense. But the whole idea of *elidable* terminators is
> that they can be elided because one (a parser or a human being) can
> reconstruct the unique (sequence of) terminators that are missing 
> If there is more than one cmavo in an elidable-terminator selma'o, this
> is not possible: does
> 
> le broda [] cu brode
> 
> mean
> 
> le broda ku cu brode
> 
> or
> 
> le broda goi'a cu brode

Which rule does the parser apply?

A. Where KU is found, insert {ku}.
B. Where KU is found, insert any member of KU.

If A, then there is no problem in having other cmavo in KU.
If B, then there is a problem, but why would B be preferable to A?

--And.