[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Collective: definition

To: jboske@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Collective: definition
From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 11:56:38 +1100

And OK, the rice was a bad example. It's retracted. I still think the indivisible tuple is useful--- that a Lojbanmass allows the reading {piroloi == pimuloi today, pimuloi tomorrow}, and that the collective blocks it. But bringing rice and eating into it was a spectacular misstep.

--
**** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** ****
* Dr Nick Nicholas, French & Italian Studies nickn@unimelb.edu.au *
University of Melbourne, Australia http://www.opoudjis.net
* "Eschewing obfuscatory verbosity of locutional rendering, the *
circumscriptional appelations are excised." --- W. Mann & S. Thompson,
* _Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organisation_, 1987. *
**** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** ****

Prev by Date: My version of the Solution
Next by Date: Re: Collective and Substance
Previous by thread: Re: [jboske] Collective: definition
Next by thread: lojbanmass
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread