RE: [jboske] piro, pisu'o and DeMorgan

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

xorxes:
> la djorden cusku di'e
[...]
> There is a difference beteween "the whole" = "the largest
> fraction" and "each fraction" 
> 
> {piro} is "the whole" and it is not "each fraction" 
> 
> The DeMorgan dual of "some fraction" is not "the largest fraction",
> it is "each fraction". In other words, {naku pisu'o naku} is
> "each fraction", not "the largest fraction" 
> 
> "The whole", unlike "each fraction", is a singular term 
> Singular terms are not affected by negation boundaries 
> {naku piro naku} is {piro}. This is not just my saying
> so, it is a property of singular terms and "the whole" is
> a singular term. If you disagree, you have not explained why 
> 
> All of the above is fully compliant with CLL, is it not?
> 
> It is you who is going against CLL if you take {piro} as
> "each fraction" 

How *do* we do "no fraction, su'o fraction, me'i fraction,
ro fraction"? How would you it were done, I mean.

--And.