RE: [jboske] piro, pisu'o and DeMorgan

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

la and cusku di'e

> How *do* we do "no fraction, su'o fraction, me'i fraction,
> ro fraction"? How would you it were done, I mean.

I suppose this should work: {no lo pisu'o lo broda},
{su'o lo pisu'o lo broda}, {me'i lo pisu'o lo broda},
{ro lo pisu'o lo broda}.

What do you think of this tentative idea: piQ turns whatever
it quantifies into Substance. I've been thinking that anything
that can be fractioned has to be a Substance (leaving aside for
the moment my interpretation of piQ with collectives).
This might allow us to keep lei/loi for both Collective and
Substance: with inner quantifier it is Collective, but with
outer piQ it is Substance because only substances can be so
quantified. (I can't see what difference could there be between
{piro lo tu'o remna} and {piro loi tu'o remna} though.)

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 3 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail&xAPID=42&PS=47575&PI=7324&DI=7474&SU= 
http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsg&HL=1216hotmailtaglines_stopmorespam_3mf