[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jboske] fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri

At 12:33 PM 12/24/02 +1100, Nick Nicholas wrote: 
So I want the impossible: both formalism and fundamentalism. Yes, I
do want the impossible. It's either that or schism. pc, Jordan, and
you have all raised the prospect. If I accede to it by not seeking
out compromise, I betray the community. I shall not preside over
schism.

I can agree with virtually everything you've said in the past couple of days, but the last sentence you stole from my mouth %^)

>Nor do I want to thwart Naturalists or those like Lojbab who want
>to see *a* loglan come to life, regardless of its merits from a
>formalist perspective. So like you I am very unsure about how to
>proceed.

I can't give either you or Bob everything you want.

But you are!

lojbab

--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org