RE: [jboske] xoi'a

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

Xod:
> Naturally, I find the fact that there are no natlang analogs to xoi'a and
> xoi'e (especially with respect to a direct treatment of "linear" and
> "exponential" functions) a very Good Thing. 

But for something that needn't be expressed by a cmavo but could be
expressed by a lujvo instead, isn't the evidence of natlangs useful
in suggesting which concepts are needed often enough to warrant
being expressed by a cmavo?

But I agree that the meanings in question are interesting to investigate.

--And.