> >... and {pi ro loi} can do collectives after all? (My real worry was
> >individuals vs. collective; substance I thought was taken care of with
> >tu'o anyway.)
>
> Yes, but {pisu'o loi} does collectives to the same extent
> that {piro loi} does collectives. When they do, one gives
> "some broda collectively" and the other gives "every broda
> collectively"
I have a slight reservation about this. If one must use inner
tu'o to get Substance (as we would like in AL), then all well
and good. But if {loi (ro)} can refer to substance then there
is no guarantee that {pi su'o loi ro} gives you a collective:
{pi mu loi ci broda nanmu} might give you, say, the bottom
halves of three people, or bodyparts totalling half the whole.