Nick on lo'e (was: RE: gadri

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

Nick:
> If the CLL lo'e is incompatible with Unique (and noone has argued to me 
> it isn't), then fundamentalism sends Unique off somewhere else 

I have argued that CLL lo'e is not incompatible with Unique. But I
don't argue that Unique is closer to the intent of CLL lo'e than
Prototype. Since SL can do Unique as {lo du be ro}, but can't
do Prototype without recourse to a lujvo (x1 is prototype of x2),
SL might as well make lo'e/le'e Prototype.

--And.