[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: [jboske] Digest Number 136


la and cusku di'e

xorxesÄ
>To do two groups of people we could use {re lu'o lo prenu}
>two masses, each of which consists of at least one person.
>This depends on how LAhEs work though, something that BF will
>have to clarify.

& pe#i LAhE shd not work thus & that "re lu#o lo prenu" is as
nonsensical as "two square=roots of 37".


But the su'o quantifier of {lo prenu} is inside the
scope of {lu'o}.

{lu'o ko'a e ko'e e ko'i} is the mass that has ko'a,
ko'e and ko'i as its components: {lu'o ro le ci broda}.
There is only one such mass, so I agree that in this
case it makes no sense to add a quantifier.

But {lu'o ko'a a ko'e a ko'i} is a mass that has at
least one of ko'a, ko'e and ko'i as components:
{lu'o su'o le ci broda}. There are seven such masses,
namely:

lu'o ko'a
lu'o ko'e
lu'o ko'i
lu'o ko'a e ko'e
lu'o ko'a e ko'i
lu'o ko'e e ko'i
lu'o ko'a e ko'e e ko'i

In this case, it does make sense to quantify over these
masses. {re lu'o su'o le ci broda} would be two of the
above masses. How else could that {su'o} be interpreted?

Another case: {lu'o re le ci broda}, a mass of two of the
three broda. There are three of those, so I would
interpret {ro lu'o re le ci broda} as something like:

ro da poi re de poi cmima lei ci broda zo'u de cmima ke'a

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 3 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail&xAPID=42&PS=47575&PI=7324&DI=7474&SU= http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsg&HL=1216hotmailtaglines_smartspamprotection_3mf