[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a gadri which will solve all our box/doctor/unicorn-wanting problems (was
- To: jboske@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: a gadri which will solve all our box/doctor/unicorn-wanting problems (was
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 18:15:46 +0000
- Bcc:
- Re: [jboske] Needed boxes)
la djorden cusku di'e
> Congratulations, you've discovered the intensional gadri!
> That's what I use {lo'e} for.
So how about using an experimental cmavo for it? If you're really
using "lo'e" as a zi'o for gadri, why use an existing gadri which
obviously has a definition other than that?
At the time I started using it, experimental cmavo were not
as much in vogue as they are now. I didn't really see it as
an option. If {lo'ei} were officialized I might change to using
that, depending on whether anybody else uses it, and on whether
anybody uses {lo'e} for something else.
Are you saying you think this is equivalent to your buska/sisku
stuff? Or just compatible with it?
Compatible, to start with. I can't really say it's equivalent
because you haven't given a strict definition. Compare for example
with http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/9710
where I gave a simlar explanation.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail