RE: [jboske] more true (was: RE: Re: ka ka (was: Context Leapers)

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

> la and cusku di'e
> 
> >{na ku ko'a ja'a cai bajra} means "It is not the case that he
> >is very much running (but he might nonetheless be running to some
> >other (lesser? -- details yet to be thrashed out) extent", IMO.
> >That is, the information added by {cai} falls within the scope
> >of the negation.
> 
> This is probably not relevant to you point (with which I agree),
> but anyway... Shouldn't {ja'a}, given that it is in NA, have the
> same exporting privileges as {na}? In that case, you'd have
> to say {na ku ja'a cai ku ko'a bajra} to get the wanted scope.

Yes, but the NA-scoping rule is one I do hope will Die in the Arse.

--And.