[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [jboske] me+moi (was: RE: la, lai, me

To: jboske@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [jboske] me+moi (was: RE: la, lai, me
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 00:07:14 +0000
Bcc:

la and cusku di'e

So {ci mu moi zo'e zo'e} does not necessarily mean "35th in
sequence zo'e ordered by criterion zo'e"?


It would mean that, unless the criterion was so weird that
it wouldn't make sense to translate it as "35th" in English.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

_________________________________________________________________ Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp

Prev by Date: Re: [jboske] scope issues
Next by Date: RE: [jboske] scope issues
Previous by thread: RE: [jboske] me+moi (was: RE: la, lai, me
Next by thread: Llamban (was Re: Lo'e le'e
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread