RE: [jboske] RE: Llamban

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

xorxes:
> la pycyn cusku di'e
> >so we know what {buska} means on in special (albeit very common)
> >cases 
> 
> Just as for any other predicate. We only know what {catlu}
> means with individual terms. What it means with other terms
> will depend on how those other terms work. {buska} is just like
> {catlu} in this regard. {buska} is just an ordinary predicate 

It's about as ordinary as djica and nitcu, which IMO are maldefined.
Kalte too. (They should take a du'u or tu'a x2. Since they don't,
we should forget about them and use lujvo replacements for them.)

--And.