Re: [jboske] Concrete examples of Llamban lo'e (was: On {lo'e} and various "{lo'e}")

[Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>]

On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Jorge Llambias wrote:

>
> la xod cusku di'e
>
> > > la djan cu darxi lo'e nanmu ze'a le jeftu
> > > John has been hitting men all week.
> >
> >I'm not sure that you care why, but I don't agree with either of these two
> >uses of lo'e. And I think that the CLL and Standard Lojban is on my side.
>
> Ok. How would you say it without {lo'e}?



He's hitting real men, and not many of them compared to the number of
humans around. What is wrong with le?




-- 
Henry McCullers, an affable Plano, TX-area anti-Semite, praised the
Jewish people Monday for doing "a bang-up job" running the media.
"This has been such a great year for movies, and the new crop of fall
TV shows looks to be one of the best in years," McCullers said.
"And the cable news channels are doing a terrific job, too. Admittedly,
they're not reporting on the Jewish stranglehold on world finance,
but, hey, that's understandable."