[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:

To: jboske@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:32:04 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <20021028130728.R28822-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> from "Invent Yourself" at Oct 28, 2002 01:08:42 PM

Invent Yourself scripsit:

> Do you sanction all that Jorge is recently saying concerning the "scope"
> of lo broda? What about the placement of tense sumtcita phrases?

Sanction, no. Nor will I impose sanctions on it. :-)

Sorry, but keeping up with jboske except in the most marginal way is
simply beyond me.

-- 
John Cowan
jcowan@reutershealth.com
I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>

References:
- Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>

Prev by Date: 'one'/mibypre (was: RE: lo'e, le'e
Next by Date: Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:
Previous by thread: Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:
Next by thread: Re: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread