[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer
forgive my ignorance, but how come 21.9999999999999 is equal to
22.0?
--And.
>>> cowan@ccil.org 10/30/02 03:00pm >>>
pycyn@aol.com scripsit:
> Well, no. By the allowal of decimal additions you have moved away from
> integers into reals. The languages of the various number systems are similar
> but not the same, just as some of the numbers each involves are similar but
> not the same. In some contexts, integer 22 can do business for real 22.0r
> but they are different critters (natural 22 is something else again still).
I don't agree. Every natural number is an integer; every integer is a
real number. 22, 22.0, 22.00000... and 21.99999... are mere notational
differences. In short, there is no identity predicate on numbers that
is finer than numeric equality.
--
"No, John. I want formats that are actually John Cowan
useful, rather than over-featured megaliths that http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
address all questions by piling on ridiculous http://www.reutershealth.com
internal links in forms which are hideously jcowan@reutershealth.com
over-complex." --Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
jboske-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/