[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:



xorxes:
> I'm surprised that {prenex tu'e ... tu'u} is not grammatical!
> I wanted to write:
> 
> da poi broda zo'u tu'e da broda
> ............ 
> ... da ...... tu'u
> 
> But it is not grammatical

Isn't tu'e introduced in the book with exactly such an example?
(Hard for me to check right now, because I haven't yet found
a way of searching my e-copy of woldy.)
--And.