[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jboske] inner quantifier of e-gadri (was: RE: putative tense scope effects



In a message dated 11/7/2002 9:16:01 AM Central Standard Time, cowan@ccil.org writes:
<<
I meant "When I was writing CLL, I believed that 'roda' implied
'su'oda'".

>>
And that was what I took you to mean: that the position in CLL was not the one that got {ro} in as default inner quantifier  -- as far as I can remember (not a pramana, remeber).