[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] Re: partial recantation in favour of solomonics

To: jboske@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] Re: partial recantation in favour of solomonics
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 14:29:48 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMMEKPGNAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk> from "And Rosta" at Nov 09, 2002 07:23:08 PM

And Rosta scripsit:

> I will restate the argument in another message, but having pondered
> the matter for a further day, I am surer that ro is importing, with
> no significantly deleterious reoercussions on usage or our
> intuitive understanding. 

Hurrah!

(to the absent pc:) Vicisti, Galilaei!

-- 
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan www.reutershealth.com
"If I have seen farther than others, it is because I am surrounded by dwarves."
--Murray Gell-Mann

References:
- RE: [lojban] Re: partial recantation in favour of solomonics
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>

Prev by Date: RE: [lojban] Re: importing ro
Next by Date: Re: [jboske] Why ro is importing & nobody should mind
Previous by thread: RE: [lojban] Re: partial recantation in favour of solomonics
Next by thread: RE: [lojban] Re: partial recantation in favour of solomonics
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread