Re: [jboske] unresolved debates

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

la djorden cusku di'e

> Not being able to say it is "able" isn't really the same as being
> "unable". The diff between na'eka'e and to'eka'e. I would agree
> that things which are cumki can't also be to'eka'e.

I don't understand the difference between "unable" and "not able".
For me "unable" is {naku ka'e}.

In any case, I don't see how some relationship can be possible
and at the same time its sumti are naku able to participate in
that possible relationship.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus