Re: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u

[Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>]

On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Robert LeChevalier wrote:


> Your argument makes sense, I think. Nick's argument makes sense, I
> think. I don't know if And's makes sense; I understood neither him nor
> Jorge when they argued the matter. But this is in part because this whole
> squinting metaphor hurts my eyes %^)


It seems that if one squints at Americans and only sees one girl, that's
e-gadri and not o-gadri. We're avoiding some bloody arguments about the
requirements of objectivity; it's been amusing to watch people dance
around the minefield with words like "veridical", and others get it flat
out wrong by applying strict standards for e-gadri.

I will really understand what Nick means about lo'e as soon he relates it
to jboske post 511.



-- 
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.