[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution

To: jboske@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 12:30:37 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMIEFBHEAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk> from "And Rosta" at Jan 06, 2003 12:23:59 PM

And Rosta scripsit:

> {lo blanu} isn't synonymous with {da poi blanu}. The former
> is countable, the latter is unspecified for countability.

I grant you (i) but I deny you (ii). "da poi blanu" means "su'o da poi
blanu", so it is countable.

-- 
Said Agatha Christie / To E. Philips Oppenheim John Cowan
"Who is this Hemingway? / Who is this Proust? jcowan@reutershealth.com
Who is this Vladimir / Whatchamacallum, http://www.reutershealth.com
This neopostrealist / Rabble?" she groused. http://www.ccil.org/cowan
--author unknown to me; any suggestions?

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>

References:
- RE: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>

Prev by Date: RE: [jboske] Hello over there
Next by Date: RE: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution
Previous by thread: RE: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution
Next by thread: RE: [jboske] Re: {lo} != {da poi}, & another Excellent Solution
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread