Re: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest

[John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>]

Robert LeChevalier scripsit:

> cowan
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/9495 (expressing belief that=20
> tu'o means mo'ezi'o, but he does not justify this in terms of CLL text -=20
> merely states it as his opinion)

On the basis of the evidence, I'm going to backpedal a bit: I think that
tu'o should be affirmatively narrowed to mean mo'e zi'o, and a new PA
should be introduced to mean mo'e zo'e (we already have no'o for mo'e zu'i).

-- 
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com http://www.reutershealth.com
"Mr. Lane, if you ever wish anything that I can do, all you will have
to do will be to send me a telegram asking and it will be done."
"Mr. Hearst, if you ever get a telegram from me asking you to do
anything, you can put the telegram down as a forgery."