[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed

To: <jboske@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 23:55:07 -0000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <200301101515.KAA29003@mail2.reutershealth.com>

John:
> I agree that it was a mistake for me to push, and for others to accept,
> the lambda-based definition of sisku. This definition must be fixed 
> But how, indeed?

1. propositionalism: seek > "endeavour to find"
2. Kinds

Kinds gives you the more naturalistic solution. Propositionalism
allows you to eschew intensionalism.

For intensional gismu, the Kind solution will be least disruptive.

--And.

References:
- Lojban is fxxxed
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>

Prev by Date: RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134))
Next by Date: RE: [jboske] Ontology #3
Previous by thread: Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed
Next by thread: Ontology #3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread