RE: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

Lojbab:
> At 11:54 AM 1/10/03 +0000, And Rosta wrote:
> > > If it is agreed that tu'o cannot overlap both zi'o and zo'e (I remain
> > > unconvinced of this),
> >
> >It is impossible to convince you of anything. If you thought 2 + 2 = 5,
> >there is no way I could convince you otherwise. Sometimes, weight of
> >opinion seems to convince you; but not argument 
> 
> Precisely. That is because I recognize that "argument" is bogus. It is 
> based on assumptions that are not agreed upon, and hence cannot generate 
> results that are agreed upon 

I agree. Argument with you is futile. Consequently if you keep trying
to participate in arguments then any sort of collaboration with you
on Lojban is futile.

--And.