[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)

To: <jboske@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:01:30 -0000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <20030112131051.X671-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>

xod:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Robert LeChevalier wrote:
> > Approach 1
> > There is only one meaning for ro, with existential import being a
> 
> What's going on here? I was under the impression that the importing of ro
> was an Answered Question 

No. We thought everyone agreed, but when I took John's silence for
consent it turned out that he had (metaphorically) just gone to the
toilet.

--And.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>

References:
- The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>

Prev by Date: RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134))
Next by Date: RE: [jboske] Substance vs Bit of Substance
Previous by thread: The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)
Next by thread: Re: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread