[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic


la djorden cusku di'e

On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:59:19AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
>
> If "ro" is taken to lack import, then "rosu'o" has import.
> If "ro" is taken to have import, however, I don't see an obvious PA
> compound that lacks import. If someone else does, speak up.

I believe it was "rosu'ono"? I think Nick suggested it? Dunno...

But that requires that ro by itself be nonimporting.

{su'ono} is the tautology quantifier. {su'ono broda cu brode} is
always true. {su'ero} is another version of same.

The contradiction quantifier (always false) is {me'ino} or {za'uro}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail