[jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 07

[Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 2:48 PM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
> coi ro do
>
> Please comment
>
> 1)
> d1 smudukti s2
> d1 is the autonym of s2
> from
> d1 dukti lo smuni be s2 s3 be'o d3
> drop s3, d3
>

    No.  This isn't right.  d1 and d2 have to be in the same class.
d1 and d2 would both be words, the SCALE/PROPERTY (d3) would be the
meaning.

I'd say:
d1dukti d2=s2 lo ka se smuni s1 s3
(d3=lo ka se smubni s1 s3)


> 2)
> d1 studukti s2 d3
> d1 are the antipodes of s2 on planet d3 (default Earth)
> from
>
> d1 dukti lo stuzi be s2 be'o tu'a d3
>

 Again, this makes no sense given how dukti is defined.  Also, how are
we suddenly confining this to a planet  (not that we can't, since this
is a lujvo), since there is no planet implied in either stuzi or dukti


> 3)
> d1 gusydicra g1 g2 g3
> d1 extinguishes light g1 illuminating g2, the light source being g3
> from
> d1 dicra lonu g1 gusni g2 g3 kei d3
> drop d3
>

  This one sounds good, although without a dictionary definition, one
might even think that a gusydicra is a se ctino.

          --gejyspa