[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Re: zdigau
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: zdigau
- From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 12:48:58 -0500
- Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:50:42 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MJTNXO5SgjysAaSb8x0vanTGsmJJy1/S7XZC6NuE/E0=; b=uqjqvVgESUh68bi6abZca1eMtCQ68RAJSIr/nh7v0EInv3jvdUPJhyFnmdW2t8+gBm iOhNEo9DsW9loc6c2p3hVumwKMKXir9kav6cFD1Wvc2PVHLnlH5LlEeR0ZD3TX+uW5ai vFZIGvoE8fEW1MJbiNqJD99aMLQ1arfiIZqcQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=m0HrCWge4UJOvAYD1pAiZp8tFMiXS+OOv8+9CNzDRF4k/cTIspnwmzskALlEsc4R19 TsQme2YMHUqePsJ/OGzYF2ScsLLvbAeje86kz8ToPjkqa/FBe0irzLtLsyv+iP9yHQ4O 5ILP8JXmlBIicFAqDF43+naUalpszrl7biiWc=
- Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTikMNz5zU==U4PJq=fL-j+nVWdQ-FG+Nny5c0Nqy@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <AANLkTikMNz5zU==U4PJq=fL-j+nVWdQ-FG+Nny5c0Nqy@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Janek <j-sz@o2.pl> wrote:
> coi
> I've added the lujvo {zdigau} to jbovlaste today, since some time ago
> I used it in my Garfield translation. I think it should follow the
> -gau pattern: g1 z1 z2 z3, but on the other hand in this case z2 is
> much more important than z1 (who is being entertained, not what is the
> entertainment). I wasn't brave enough to switch them though.
> mu'o mi'e ianek
Yeah, breaking the -gau pattern would be a bad idea. Unfortunately,
you have two definitions here that are that appear to be contradictory
in the normal definition writing style. Suggest simply using your
second one, which also contains the z3.
--gejyspa