[jbovlaste] Re: Ramadan etc

[Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Pierre Abbat<phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 September 2009 11:14:39 Michael Turniansky wrote:
>>   Why the need for a brivla at all?  Why not la ramadan.  Problem
>> solved.  It's like saying we need a brivla for for "pi'ekarskis"...
>
> Because it's a month. There's one in every year. x1 is the Ramadan of year x2.


  If that's your argument, then why just focus on Ramadan, why not
fu'ivla for  Muharram, Safar, Rabi' al-awwal, etc. etc.? And The
Hebrew months, and the months of other calendrical systems?  If you
have la ramadan you can certainly say "ti me la ramadan de'i li
pi'epi'e pavocino" or the like.  The existence of one la ramadan also
doesn't preclude the existence of another, just like one pir doesn't
prevent another from existing?

                --gejyspa