[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Re: doi ARJ
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 05:57:35PM +0200, tijlan wrote:
> Could you please enlighten me on how i messed up on 'almost all' of
> the recent changes i did to jbovlaste? What is incorrect about
> "bapli", for instance?
My apologies for the outburst. Your edits are mostly sound, and I appreciate that. But on that day there were some very odd edits that made me concerned (actually only two, but it seemed much more at the time):
On lamji:
Word: immediate, In Sense: happening right away
But "lamji" refers to something that is next to something else in a sequence, not something that happens right away.
On bapli:
Place Keywords:
Word: effect, In Sense: result, For Place: 1
But the x1 of bapli is not an effect, it is more like a cause. If anything in bapli is an effect, it is the x2.
Soon after that, I discovered your earlier edit for culno, which is equally perplexing:
Word: whole, In Sense: entirety, For Place: 1
Was this change meant to be on mulno?
--
Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/
Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule. Ice is cool.