[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 12
- To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 12
- From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 08:53:17 -0400
- Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 05:55:51 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jSppVSVPfe/owScGGHk1MSOLpUJG+TYC4GqWWylPDP8=; b=nZ+bbRICn7urv1DsYAa7dvYDOjvaUY72DwW9xnV0x9mcCi8K6Pz6/UJuDZzVAn5Dyw Z6ROGrBne2yLOL1p0UTjo+yPiGLmByi/JuH+NhyLZv1yVNYrGqaugxtfTD6ct+q8ho17 vjE2mrcDCoSxSVdx6AkzvqffWVArtrUEs+eNI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=PaqjQW80G11BMZxMim7QQ2of1h2qshVRurV73wFNle/dy6bS5kwqqcliOceb9m0Ztg ZME2iPJ483fw7JmCaJNKM9ta+JSWV9k8apGiu2loCsR+dWiOi/Vw8Be4xeucKcJYrDSS NpTtPpG8sk0dAfJrV+58S/qfwYCF5lCHG9vL0=
- Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
- In-reply-to: <558537.71010.qm@web88002.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
- References: <558537.71010.qm@web88002.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
- Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:34 PM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
> coi ro do
>
> Please comment:
>
> 1
> )jdijmaji
>
> jm1=jd1 (mass/jo'u) assemble/meet/gather/[form a caucus] at location jm2 from
> locations jm2 to make decision(s) jd2 (du'u) about matter jd3 (event/state).
>
> gloss:
> caucus
> assembly; organized to make decision
> meeting; organized to make decision
>
>
> from
> jm1=jd1 jmaji jm2 jm3 tezu'e lonu jdice jd2 jd3
It's alright, but (and without having seen the Alice text where it
is used in context) I wonder if the decision making might be more
germane than the location, entailing your jm2 should be put at the
end? *shrug* I guess it's a close call.
>
> 2) flacau
>
> c1=f3 [lacks law]/[is lawless with regard to] law(s) f1 specifying f2
> (state/event) under conditions f4 by lawgiver(s) f5; c1=f3 is lawless
>
> from
> c1=f3 claxu lonu te flalu f1 f2 f4 f5
>
Good
> 3) naijgi
>
> j1 is a patriot of nation n1
>
> from
> j1 jgira lonu n1 natmi n2
>
Your English doesn't match your lojban, but I wonder if n2 should
be/must be/shouldn't be =j1?
--gejyspa