If you've just coined farklaji as runway, then there are no farklajis that aren't runways.
But wouldn't it make sense, since runways are generally called by their numbers, to have the number as the first place of farklaji. As in:
li xa farklaji la sxifol - 6 is a runway in Schiphol
So we have: f1 is a runway in (airport) k2
As for x3, the runways are for accessing both the air and the land. So perhaps we should use {lo vacri} or {lo tumla} for the third position, depending on whether this runway is used for landing or taking off (they usually use one direction for each, no?)
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Pierre Abbat
<phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
I coined "farklaji" for "runway", because runways are designated by a number
for their direction (e.g. runway 6 is in direction 60° and is called runway
24 in the other direction). What's the place structure?
klaji: x1 is a street at x2 accessing x3.
All runways access the air, so x3 could be dropped, but maybe there are
farklaji that aren't runways, for which x3 of klaji is important. In that
case, should f1 be inserted before k3 or after it?
Pierre
--
La sal en el mar es más que en la sangre.
Le sel dans la mer est plus que dans le sang.