[jbovlaste] Re: [jvs-watch] Per arj: Definition Edited At Word kamjunmre

[Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org>]

On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:29:02PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> Arnt:
> 
> I believe your goal here was to drop the rather spurious definitions
> of place 3 and 4, but leave the definitions of places 5, 6 and 7
> intact.  I further suspect that you left 3 and 4 blank to do so.
> 
> What seems to have actually happened is that 5-7 were moved up to
> 3-5, dropping the blank spots.
> 
> I call that a bug.
> 
> Confirm that I understood your intentions correctly, please, and
> I'll see about fixing it.

That is absolutely correct. I didn't realise that 5-7 were moved up.

-- 
Arnt Richard Johansen                                http://arj.nvg.org/
Leser �Catcher in the Rye�. Skal bli fint � bli ferdig med den s� jeg
f�r litt mer dopapir.                 --Erling Kagge: Alene til Sydpolen