[jbovlaste] Re: Request For Comments: proposed Jbovlaste guidelines

[Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>]

The reason I was disallowed from a jbovlaste account is that
example,based on the text I submitted, I was deemed under-qualified to
invent valid new lujvo. If I were granted a jbovlaste account, I could
use it to apply these guidelines to existing definitions; that would
not require that I possess the expertise to invent new lujvo.
Therefore, I would like to re-apply for a jbovlaste account.

-Eppcott


On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Kevin Reid<kpreid@mac.com> wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2009, at 14:12, A. PIEKARSKI wrote:
>
>> I really like these guidelines and I wish I had know about them
>> earlier.  I certainly intend to use them, except for...
>> "...the notes field for a lujvo should not explain which gismu it is
>> composed of..."
>>
>> Why so?
>
> I don't know the original motive, but such information could be computed
> rather than handwritten.
>
> --
> Kevin Reid                                  <http://switchb.org/kpreid/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>