[jbovlaste] Re: from core to exosphere

[Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:06 AM, tijlan<jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/8/17 Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 7:35 AM, tijlan<jbotijlan@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> 2009/8/14 Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
>>>>

>>>
>>
>> But [moi] aren't parts of a whole (even if I was inclined to used mo'i
>> with non-numbers, which I'm personally not), si'e would be.
>
> "si'e" would have been an alternative if it had a rafsi.

  Right, you would have been forced to use zei if you had gone that route.

>
>>  I'd also
>> disgaree that glavacri would only imply, e.g. air in a balloon, since
>> it does have a "planet" piece. But even besides all that, why not use
>> glavarsenta, etc. since are specifically describing layers of the
>> atmosphere?
>
> Yes, I had given it some thought. But the crust, the mantle, and the
> core are also layers. If we are to have "glavarsenta", it would make
> more sense to have "jduro'isenta" instead of "jduro'i". I'm happy with
> either one. If you think "glavarsenta" and "jduro'isenta" are better,
> I'll go for that.
>

("jduroksenta", actually, but yes, I would personally think those better.)

                   --gejyspa