[jbovlaste] Re: malranxi

["A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>]

----- Original Message ----
> From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
> To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
> Sent: Wed, December 2, 2009 12:34:47 PM
> Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: malranxi
> 
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM, A. PIEKARSKI wrote:
> > Comments, please.
> >
> > malranxi r1=m2 is sarcastic as used/stated by m3
> >
> > from
> >
> > mabla: m1 is a derogative connotation/sense of m2 used by m3
> > ranxi: r1 is ironic(al)/contrary to expectation r2 in state/property/aspect 
> r3.
> >
> > gloss:
> > sarcastic
> > caustic sounding
> >
> > This assumes that r1 is an abstraction, not a person.
> > Try as I may, I can't see any use for r1 or r2.
> >
> 
>   Did you mean r2/r3?
>   

Sorry, yes I do.

And by 'sarcastic' I meant 'being ironic with intent to harm or 
be unpleasant to someone.

totus