[jbovlaste] Re: za'e mablrxasxolo (was: Re: Newbie: How does voting work...

[MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com]

In a message dated 7/10/2009 18:48:54 Eastern Daylight Time, ted.reed@gmail.com writes:


> > The American Heritage dictionary says it means "an irritating or
> > contemptible person". I think that all of these English phrases
> > describe a more general concept than "selfish" or "bad": "bad/
> > irritating/mean/malicious/selfish/contemptible" plus "person".
> >
> >
> > That's close to what I was trying to suggest.
>
> xlapre?
>
> --bancus


"bad person"?  In this context, I think that's way too broad a word.  Each of the adjectives "bad", "irritating", "mean", "malicious", "selfish", "contemptible", and more should have its own word or phrase, with or without "prenu".  

And why a lujvo?  A tanru should be fine in most, if not all, cases.

stevo